|
''National Organization for Women v. Scheidler'', 510 U.S. 249 (1994), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) could apply to enterprises without economic motives; pro-life protesters could thus be prosecuted under it. An organization without an economic motive can still affect interstate or foreign commerce and thus satisfy the Act's definition of a racketeering enterprise. The Court did not issue judgment on whether or not the Pro-Life Action Network, the organization in question, had committed actions that could be prosecuted under RICO. G. Robert Blakey argued on behalf of Scheidler, while Miguel Estrada represented the United States as ''amicus curiae'' in favor of reversal. == External links == * (Decision in the case ) * (FindLaw ) * (Oyez ) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「National Organization for Women v. Scheidler」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|